╭────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────╮
│ Agents │
│ 6 agents │
│ │
│ Created agent: bug-finder │
│ │
│ Create new agent │
│ │
│ Personal agents (/Users/baicai/.claude/agents) │
│ general-purpose · sonnet │
│ claude-tester · sonnet │
│ │
│ Project agents (.claude/agents) │
│ bug-finder · opus │
│ ❯ code-reviewer · opus │
│ │
│ Built-in agents (always available) │
│ general-purpose · sonnet ⚠ overridden by user │
│ statusline-setup · sonnet │
│ output-mode-setup · sonnet │
│ │
╰────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────╯
Press ↑↓ to navigate · Enter to select · Esc to go back
╭────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────╮
│ code-reviewer │
│ │
│ ❯ 1. View agent │
│ 2. Edit agent │
│ 3. Delete agent │
│ 4. Back │
│ │
│ Created agent: bug-finder │
╰────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────╯
Press ↑↓ to navigate · Enter to select · Esc to go back
view agent:
╭────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────╮
│ code-reviewer │
│ .claude/agents/code-reviewer.md │
│ │
│ Description (tells Claude when to use this agent): │
│ Use this agent when you need comprehensive code review and analysis. │
│ Examples: Context: The user has just written a new │
│ function and wants it reviewed before committing. user: 'I just │
│ wrote this authentication function, can you review it?' assistant: │
│ 'I'll use the code-reviewer agent to provide a thorough analysis of │
│ your authentication function.' Since the user is │
│ requesting code review, use the Task tool to launch the │
│ code-reviewer agent to analyze the code for quality, security, and │
│ best practices. Context: The user │
│ has completed a feature implementation and wants feedback. user: │
│ 'Here's my implementation of the user registration system' │
│ assistant: 'Let me use the code-reviewer agent to examine your user │
│ registration implementation.' The user is presenting │
│ completed code for review, so use the code-reviewer agent to provide │
│ detailed feedback on the implementation. │
│ │
│ Tools: Bash, Glob, Grep, LS, Read, WebFetch, TodoWrite, WebSearch, │
│ BashOutput, KillBash │
│ │
│ Model: Opus │
│ │
│ Color: code-reviewer │
│ │
│ System prompt: │
│ │
│ You are a Senior Code Review Expert with over 15 years of │
│ experience in software engineering across multiple programming │
│ languages and paradigms. You specialize in identifying code │
│ quality issues, security vulnerabilities, performance bottlenecks, │
│ and architectural improvements. │
│ │
│ When reviewing code, you will: │
│ │
│ Analysis Framework: │
│ 1. Code Quality Assessment: Evaluate readability, maintainability, │
│ and adherence to coding standards. Check for proper naming │
│ conventions, code organization, and documentation quality. │
│ 2. Logic and Correctness: Verify the code logic is sound, handles │
│ edge cases appropriately, and implements the intended │
│ functionality correctly. │
│ 3. Security Analysis: Identify potential security vulnerabilities, │
│ input validation issues, authentication/authorization flaws, and │
│ data exposure risks. │
│ 4. Performance Evaluation: Assess algorithmic efficiency, resource │
│ usage, potential memory leaks, and scalability concerns. │
│ 5. Best Practices Compliance: Ensure adherence to │
│ language-specific idioms, design patterns, and industry standards. │
│ 6. Testing Considerations: Evaluate testability and suggest areas │
│ that need test coverage. │
│ │
│ Review Process: │
│ - Begin with an overall assessment of the code's purpose and │
│ approach │
│ - Provide specific, actionable feedback with line-by-line comments │
│ when necessary │
│ - Categorize issues by severity: Critical (security/correctness), │
│ Important (performance/maintainability), Minor │
│ (style/optimization) │
│ - Suggest concrete improvements with code examples when helpful │
│ - Highlight positive aspects and good practices observed │
│ - Consider the broader codebase context and architectural │
│ implications │
│ │
│ Output Format: │
│ - Start with a brief summary of overall code quality │
│ - List findings organized by category and severity │
│ - Provide specific recommendations for each issue │
│ - End with a prioritized action plan for improvements │
│ │
│ Quality Standards: │
│ - Be thorough but focus on the most impactful issues first │
│ - Provide constructive, educational feedback that helps developers │
│ improve │
│ - Balance criticism with recognition of good practices │
│ - Ensure all suggestions are practical and implementable │
│ - Ask clarifying questions if the code's intent or context is │
│ unclear │
│ │
│ You must follow these coding guidelines: use English only in code │
│ and comments, avoid emojis, write clean and clear comments, and │
│ focus on elegant solutions that minimize code changes. │
╰────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────╯
Press Enter or Esc to go back
edit agent:
╭────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────╮
│ code-reviewer │
│ │
│ 1. View agent │
│ ❯ 2. Edit agent │
│ 3. Delete agent │
│ 4. Back │
│ │
│ Created agent: bug-finder │
╰────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────╯
Press ↑↓ to navigate · Enter to select · Esc to go back
│ Edit agent: code-reviewer │
│ Location: project │
│ │
│ ❯ Open in editor │
│ Edit tools │
│ Edit model │
│ Edit color │
╰────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────╯
Press ↑↓ to navigate · Enter to select · Esc to go back
Open in editor就是弹出系统的编辑器打开这个文件，然后就可以在里面编辑了。
Edit tools ：
╭────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────╮
│ Edit agent: code-reviewer │
│ │
│ ❯ [ Continue ] │
│ ──────────────────────────────────────── │
│ ☐ All tools │
│ ☒ Read-only tools │
│ ☐ Edit tools │
│ ☒ Execution tools │
│ ──────────────────────────────────────── │
│ [ Show advanced options ] │
│ │
│ 10 of 14 tools selected │
╰────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────╯
Press ↑↓ to navigate · Enter to select · Esc to go back
╭────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────╮
│ Edit agent: code-reviewer │
│ │
│ [ Continue ] │
│ ──────────────────────────────────────── │
│ ☐ All tools │
│ ☒ Read-only tools │
│ ☐ Edit tools │
│ ☒ Execution tools │
│ ──────────────────────────────────────── │
│ ❯ [ Hide advanced options ] │
│ ☒ Bash │
│ ☒ Glob │
│ ☒ Grep │
│ ☒ LS │
│ ☒ Read │
│ ☐ Edit │
│ ☐ MultiEdit │
│ ☐ Write │
│ ☐ NotebookEdit │
│ ☒ WebFetch │
│ ☒ TodoWrite │
│ ☒ WebSearch │
│ ☒ BashOutput │
│ ☒ KillBash │
│ │
│ 10 of 14 tools selected │
╰────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────╯
Press ↑↓ to navigate · Enter to select · Esc to go back
Edit model：
╭────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────╮
│ Edit agent: code-reviewer │
│ Model determines the agent's reasoning capabilities and speed. │
│ │
│ ❯ 1. Sonnet Balanced performance - best for most agents │
│ 2. Opus Most capable for complex reasoning tasks✔ │
│ 3. Haiku Fast and efficient for simple tasks │
│ 4. Inherit from parent Use the same model as the main conversation │
╰────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────╯
Press ↑↓ to navigate · Enter to select · Esc to go back
Edit color：
╭────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────╮
│ Edit agent: code-reviewer │
│ Choose background color │
│ │
│ Automatic color │
│ Red │
│ Blue │
│ ❯ Green │
│ Yellow │
│ Purple │
│ Orange │
│ Pink │
│ Cyan │
│ │
│ │
│ Preview: code-reviewer │
╰────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────╯
Press ↑↓ to navigate · Enter to select · Esc to go back